It's a facet, not an actor

This commit is contained in:
Tony Garnock-Jones 2022-05-13 14:07:12 +02:00
parent 997367e72a
commit 7ae9e557d1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ with zero or more native threads, coroutines, objects, or other language-specifi
representations of asynchronous activities. When such a facet stops (either by explicit [stop
action][action] or by crash-termination of the facet's actor), its linked tasks are also
terminated. By default, the converse is also the case: a terminating linked task will trigger
termination of its associated actor. This allows for resource management patterns similar to
termination of its associated facet. This allows for resource management patterns similar to
those enabled by the related idea of [linked actors][].
## Macaroon