|
|
|
|
@ -557,10 +557,10 @@ interested in the `present` constructor.
@@ -557,10 +557,10 @@ interested in the `present` constructor.
|
|
|
|
|
relayed assertion to do so. |
|
|
|
|
- There's also a need for `(opaque-placeholder)`s to frustrate |
|
|
|
|
constant-matching against literal `(discard)` in cases of |
|
|
|
|
visibility restriction. See commit b4f1d36 and test case |
|
|
|
|
visibility restriction. See commit 937bb7a and test case |
|
|
|
|
`test/core/nesting-confusion-2.rkt`. |
|
|
|
|
- HOWEVER see notes from 2019-06-18 in the googledoc Journal as |
|
|
|
|
well as in my notebook. See also commit 5c514b7 from |
|
|
|
|
well as in my notebook. See also commit 5923bdd from |
|
|
|
|
imperative-syndicate and e806f4b from syndicate-js. The |
|
|
|
|
opaque-placeholders make the distributed (= non-zero-latency) |
|
|
|
|
case of visibility-restriction handling problematic in general, |
|
|
|
|
|
