--- title: Two-Party Buyer Protocol --- # {{ page.title }} This is an extended two-buyer book-purchase protocol, based loosely on an example given in: > K. Honda, N. Yoshida, and M. Carbone, “Multiparty asynchronous > session types,” POPL 2008. ## The Scenario A book-seller responds to requests for book prices when asked. A pair of prospective buyers run through a shopping list. For each book, the first buyer offers to split the cost of the book with the second. If the second has enough money left, it accepts; otherwise, it rejects the offer, and the first buyer tries a different split. If the second buyer agrees to a split, it then negotiates the purchase of the book with the book-seller. ## The Protocol ### Role: SELLER When interest in `bookQuote($title, _)` appears, asserts `bookQuote(title, Maybe Float)`, `false` meaning not available, and otherwise an asking-price. When interest in `order($title, $offer-price, _, _)` appears, asserts `order(title, offer-price, false, false)` for "no sale", otherwise `order(title, offer-price, PositiveInteger, String)`, an accepted sale. ### Role: BUYER Observes `bookQuote(title, $price)` to learn prices. Observes `order(title, offer-price, $id, $delivery-date)` to make orders. ### Role: SPLIT-PROPOSER Observes `splitProposal(title, asking-price, contribution, $accepted)` to make a split-proposal and learn whether it was accepted or not. ### Role: SPLIT-DISPOSER When interest in `splitProposal($title, $asking-price, $contribution, _)` appears, asserts `splitProposal(title, askingPrice, contribution, true)` to indicate they are willing to go through with the deal, in which case they then perform the role of BUYER for title/asking-price, or asserts `splitProposal(title, asking-price, contribution, false)` to indicate they are unwilling to go through with the deal. ## The Code ### Type Declarations First, we declare *assertion types* for our protocol. assertion type bookQuote(title, price); assertion type order(title, price, id, deliveryDate); assertion type splitProposal(title, price, contribution, accepted); ### Utilities This routine is under consideration for possible addition to the core library. function whileRelevantAssert(P) { react { assert P; } until { case retracted Syndicate.observe(P); } } ### Implementation: SELLER function seller() { actor { We give our actor two state variables: a dictionary recording our inventory of books (mapping title to price), and a counter tracking the next order ID to be allocated. this.books = { "The Wind in the Willows": 3.95, "Catch 22": 2.22, "Candide": 34.95 }; this.nextOrderId = 10001483; Looking up a price yields `false` if no such book is in our inventory. this.priceOf = function (title) { return (title in this.books) && this.books[title]; }; The seller responds to interest in bookQuotes by asserting a responsive record, if one exists. react { during Syndicate.observe(bookQuote($title, _)) { assert bookQuote(title, this.priceOf(title)); } } It also responds to order requests. react { on asserted Syndicate.observe(order($title, $offerPrice, _, _)) { We cannot sell a book we do not have, and we will not sell for less than our asking price. var askingPrice = this.priceOf(title); if ((askingPrice === false) || (offerPrice < askingPrice)) { whileRelevantAssert( order(title, offerPrice, false, false)); } else { But if we can sell it, we do so by allocating an order ID and replying to the orderer. var orderId = this.nextOrderId++; delete this.books[title]; actor { whileRelevantAssert( order(title, offerPrice, orderId, "March 9th")); } } } } } } ### Implementation: SPLIT-PROPOSER and book-quote-requestor function buyerA() { actor { var self = this; Our actor remembers which books remain on its shopping list, and tries to buy them one at a time, sharing costs with `buyerB`. self.titles = ["Catch 22", "Encyclopaedia Brittannica", "Candide", "The Wind in the Willows"]; JavaScript's callback-oriented blocking means that we express our loop in almost a tail-recursive style, using helper functions `buyBooks` and `trySplit`. buyBooks(); function buyBooks() { if (self.titles.length === 0) { console.log("A has bought everything they wanted!"); return; } var title = self.titles.shift(); First, retrieve a quote for the title, and analyze the result. react until { case asserted bookQuote(title, $price) { if (price === false) { console.log("A learns that "+title+" is out-of-stock."); buyBooks(); } else { console.log("A learns that the price of "+title+ " is "+price); Next, repeatedly make split offers to a SPLIT-DISPOSER until either one is accepted, or the contribution from the SPLIT-DISPOSER becomes pointlessly small. We start the process by offering to split the price of the book evenly. trySplit(title, price, price / 2); } } } } function trySplit(title, price, contribution) { console.log("A makes an offer to split the price of "+title+ " contributing "+contribution); If we are about to offer to split the price, but the other buyer would contribute less than 10c, then it's not worth bothering; we may as well buy it ourselves. Another version of the program could perform the BUYER role here. if (contribution > (price - 0.10)) { console.log("A gives up on "+title+"."); buyBooks(); } else { Make our proposal, and wait for a response. react until { case asserted splitProposal(title, price, contribution, true) { console.log("A learns that the split-proposal for "+ title+" was accepted"); buyBooks(); } case asserted splitProposal(title, price, contribution, false) { console.log("A learns that the split-proposal for "+ title+" was rejected"); trySplit(title, price, contribution + ((price - contribution) / 2)); } } } } } } ### Implementation: SPLIT-DISPOSER and BUYER function buyerB() { actor { This actor maintains a record of the amount of money it has left to spend. this.funds = 5.00; It spends its time waiting for a SPLIT-PROPOSER to offer a `splitProposal`. react { on asserted Syndicate.observe(splitProposal($title, $price, $theirContribution, _)) { var myContribution = price - theirContribution; console.log("B is being asked to contribute "+myContribution+ " toward "+title+" at price "+price); We may not be able to afford contributing this much. if (myContribution > this.funds) { console.log("B hasn't enough funds ("+this.funds+ " remaining)"); whileRelevantAssert( splitProposal(title, price, theirContribution, false)); } else { But if we *can* afford it, update our remaining funds and spawn a small actor to handle the actual purchase now that we have agreed on a split. var remainingFunds = this.funds - myContribution; console.log("B accepts the offer, leaving them with "+ remainingFunds+" remaining funds"); this.funds = remainingFunds; actor { react { While waiting for order confirmation, take the opportunity to signal to our SPLIT-PROPOSER that we accepted their proposal. assert splitProposal(title, price, theirContribution, true); When order confirmation arrives, this purchase is completed. } until { case asserted order(title, price, $id, $date) { console.log("The order for "+title+" has id "+id+ ", and will be delivered on "+date); } } } } } } } } ### Starting Configuration ground dataspace { seller(); buyerA(); buyerB(); } ## A Sample Run Run the program with `../../bin/syndicatec index.js | node` from a checkout of the Syndicate repository. A learns that the price of Catch 22 is 2.22 A makes an offer to split the price of Catch 22 contributing 1.11 B is being asked to contribute 1.11 toward Catch 22 at price 2.22 B accepts the offer, leaving them with 3.8899999999999997 remaining funds A learns that the split-proposal for Catch 22 was accepted A learns that Encyclopaedia Brittannica is out-of-stock. The order for Catch 22 has id 10001483, and will be delivered on March 9th A learns that the price of Candide is 34.95 A makes an offer to split the price of Candide contributing 17.475 B is being asked to contribute 17.475 toward Candide at price 34.95 B hasn't enough funds (3.8899999999999997 remaining) A learns that the split-proposal for Candide was rejected A makes an offer to split the price of Candide contributing 26.212500000000002 B is being asked to contribute 8.7375 toward Candide at price 34.95 B hasn't enough funds (3.8899999999999997 remaining) A learns that the split-proposal for Candide was rejected A makes an offer to split the price of Candide contributing 30.581250000000004 B is being asked to contribute 4.368749999999999 toward Candide at price 34.95 B hasn't enough funds (3.8899999999999997 remaining) A learns that the split-proposal for Candide was rejected A makes an offer to split the price of Candide contributing 32.765625 B is being asked to contribute 2.184375000000003 toward Candide at price 34.95 B accepts the offer, leaving them with 1.7056249999999968 remaining funds A learns that the split-proposal for Candide was accepted A learns that the price of The Wind in the Willows is 3.95 A makes an offer to split the price of The Wind in the Willows contributing 1.975 The order for Candide has id 10001484, and will be delivered on March 9th B is being asked to contribute 1.975 toward The Wind in the Willows at price 3.95 B hasn't enough funds (1.7056249999999968 remaining) A learns that the split-proposal for The Wind in the Willows was rejected A makes an offer to split the price of The Wind in the Willows contributing 2.9625000000000004 B is being asked to contribute 0.9874999999999998 toward The Wind in the Willows at price 3.95 B accepts the offer, leaving them with 0.718124999999997 remaining funds A learns that the split-proposal for The Wind in the Willows was accepted A has bought everything they wanted! The order for The Wind in the Willows has id 10001485, and will be delivered on March 9th