From 90ed5bc6d74f3445c2560d327cbaf9a76583f75d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Lemmer Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 19:38:43 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Be more precise when talking about records (rather than
 saying objects)

---
 TUTORIAL.org | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/TUTORIAL.org b/TUTORIAL.org
index f8c51b0..b15881a 100644
--- a/TUTORIAL.org
+++ b/TUTORIAL.org
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ And very interestingly, they can also be other records:
   "content": "Say, did you finish reading that book I lent you?"}>
 #+END_SRC
 
-Do you see it?  This object's type is... an iri Record!
+Do you see it?  This Record's tag is... an iri Record!
 The link here points to a more precise term saying that "this is a
 note meant to be sent around in social networks".
 It is considerably more precise than just using the string or symbol