Follow formatting convention
This commit is contained in:
parent
37a12b3595
commit
872ea562a2
10
TUTORIAL.org
10
TUTORIAL.org
|
@ -295,8 +295,9 @@ decentralized systems.
|
|||
Likewise, it is also possible to annotate records with integers.
|
||||
Languages like OCaml use integers instead of symbolic record labels
|
||||
because their type systems ensure that it is never ambiguous what,
|
||||
say, the label =23= means in any given context. Allowing integer
|
||||
record labels lets Preserves directly express OCaml data.
|
||||
say, the label =23= means in any given context.
|
||||
Allowing integer record labels lets Preserves directly express OCaml
|
||||
data.
|
||||
|
||||
# 2019-08-18 14:06:24 tonyg -- I like the following idea in principle,
|
||||
# but I don't think it belongs here yet. The *binary* syntax has
|
||||
|
@ -441,8 +442,9 @@ the internal name of the server that produced the response:
|
|||
|
||||
The annotations aren't related to the data requested, which is all
|
||||
about "employees"; instead, they're about the systems that produced
|
||||
the response. You could say they're in the domain of "debugging"
|
||||
instead of the domain of "employees".
|
||||
the response.
|
||||
You could say they're in the domain of "debugging" instead of the
|
||||
domain of "employees".
|
||||
|
||||
* Conclusions
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue