From 70ce961dd222b92c9985eb7f24603cc8cdccfaac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tony Garnock-Jones Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 22:01:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Mention Pointers in canonical-binary.md --- canonical-binary.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/canonical-binary.md b/canonical-binary.md index 7d192b4..097ace1 100644 --- a/canonical-binary.md +++ b/canonical-binary.md @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ representations of their keys.[^no-need-for-by-value] **Other kinds of `Value`.** There are no special canonicalization restrictions on `SignedInteger`s, `String`s, `ByteString`s, `Symbol`s, `Boolean`s, -`Float`s, `Double`s, `Record`s, or `Sequence`s. The constraints given -for these `Value`s in the [specification][spec] suffice to ensure -canonicity. +`Float`s, `Double`s, `Record`s, `Sequence`s, or `Pointer`s. The +constraints given for these `Value`s in the [specification][spec] +suffice to ensure canonicity. ## Notes